| |
|
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
|
Contact:
|
Dara Klatt
|
|
January 22, 2003
|
|
The PBN Company
|
|
|
|
Tel. 202-466-6210
|
|
|
|
|
CITAC STEEL TASK FORCE: DOMESTIC STEEL PRODUCERS'
BID TO EXPAND STEEL TARIFFS ANOTHER ATTEMPT
TO CLOSE U.S. MARKET TO IMPORTS
Move Shows That No Amount of Protection
Will Satisfy the Protectionists in the US Steel Industry
Washington, DC - The Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition
Steel Task Force (CITAC STF) submitted a letter
today to US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick and Commerce Secretary
Donald Evans urging the Bush Administration to reject a recent request
by seven U.S. steel producers to expand the Section 201 tariffs
to include 30 developing countries plus Mexico, and requesting the
Administration examine the impact that the tariffs have had on steel
consumers in the U.S.
In the letter signed by its counsel Lewis Leibowitz and Lynn Kamarck,
the CITAC STF stressed that the existing tariffs have already caused
severe damage to U.S. downstream industries. "The competitive
impact on steel consuming industries is clear and simple: while
steel imports are restricted, imports of steel-containing manufactured
goods are not. Many U.S. manufacturers have lost considerable business
to foreign competitors who have access to lower-priced steel that
is available in international markets, but is now denied to U.S.
manufacturers."
"The Administration should not further restrict imports without
full consideration of the effects of such restrictions on U.S. manufacturers,
including steel consuming industries," continued Leibowitz
and Kamarck. "Such an analysis is not only essential for downstream
U.S. manufacturers; it is also essential to safeguard the customer
base for U.S. steel producers. Apparently oblivious to the effects
of their efforts on their own customers, U.S. steel producers are
rapidly undermining their own future by urging ever-higher prices."
Last week, the domestic steel industry submitted a letter to Ambassador
Zoellick and Secretary Evans, using skewed statistics in an attempt
to make it appear that steel imports from developing countries and
Mexico exempted from the Section 201 tariffs by President
Bush are "surging."
A closer look at the statistics submitted by the domestic steel
industry reveals that slab (semifinished) products are conveniently
excluded from total imports of flat-rolled products even though
the International Trade Commission (ITC) and President Bush included
slab products in the flat-rolled category during the Section 201
process.
"It's obvious why the domestic steel industry omitted slabs,"
William Gaskin, President of the Precision Metalforming Association
(PMA) and member of CITAC STF. "Developing countries on the
list don't export much slab to the U.S. When imports are totaled
using all flat-rolled imports including slabs, the percentage of
import share from these developing countries is actually much lower
proving there is no 'surge of imports' and therefore no evidence
for additional tariffs."
Said Gaskin, "In their letter, U.S. producers also blame developing
country imports for falling prices in recent months and reduced
capacity utilization, ignoring the fact that several dormant domestic
steel mills have been restarted since the 201 tariffs, adding 8.5
million tons of steel production into the U.S. market."
Gaskin continued, "The tariffs imposed last year led to huge
price increases, supply disruptions and massive business and financial
losses to steel consumers. Many downstream industries are going
out of business, or being forced to move overseas, causing Americans
to lose their jobs. Attempting to expand tariffs to developing countries
isn't going to solve the domestic steel industry's biggest problem:
their refusal to compete in the global marketplace."
Gaskin pointed out that the Bush Administration last week rejected
proposed quotas to limit imports of mechanical devices from China
after considering the estimated damage it would cause downstream
industries.
"As with the recent case on mechanical devices, the Bush Administration
should consider the needs of steel consumers in formulating steel
trade policy." He concluded, "We ask that the Bush Administration
direct the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to gather evidence
of the impact of the Section 201 steel tariffs already in place
on both steel producers and steel consumers."
To read the text of the letter submitted today by the CITAC STF,
please visit http://citac.info/steeltaskforce/currentnews/01_22_2003.htm.
CITAC is a coalition of companies
and organizations committed to promoting a trade arena where U.S.
consuming industries and their workers have access to global markets
for imports that enhance the international competitiveness of American
firms. The CITAC Steel Task Force is comprised of steel consumers
working to achieve the termination of the 201 steel tariffs by mid-point
review and reform U.S. trade laws and policies to benefit steel
consumers.
|