| |
|
|
| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
Dara Klatt |
| May 1, 2003 |
|
The PBN Company |
| |
|
Tel. 202-466-6210 |
| |
|
|
CITAC: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION'S REJECTION
OF DUTIES ON FERTILIZER IS LONG-AWAITED WIN FOR U.S. FARMERS
Washington, DC - Consuming Industries Trade Action
Coalition (CITAC) Executive Director Janet Kopenhaver said today that
the International Trade Commission's (ITC) recent unanimous decision that
imports of urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) from Belarus, Russia and Ukraine
do not materially injure U.S. producers "is good news for American
farmers."
The ITC case was the third antidumping case since 1999 that U.S. fertilizer
producers filed against imports of nitrogen fertilizers - UAN is one type
of fertilizer used by many American farmers. An affirmative injury vote
would have resulted in duties ranging from 76% to 327% on UAN imports
from the three subject countries, and would have locked out needed imports
from the market.
"The ITC looked at all the evidence and made a logical decision.
UAN imports are vital to American farmers and to the U.S. market as a
whole," continued Kopenhaver.
For over a year, the Committee for Competitive Fertilizer Markets, a
group of concerned farmers, fertilizer dealers and others, vigorously
opposed the antidumping investigation. They argued that, following the
hike in natural gas prices in 2000 and early 2001, U.S. producers significantly
reduced UAN production, told farmers and others to look elsewhere for
UAN supplies, and then blamed the resulting profit crunch on "cheap
imports" - which they later attempted to exclude from entering the
U.S. with an antidumping investigation.
The ITC Commissioners confirmed these facts in their written decision:
"The increase in subject imports came at a time of domestic production
curtailments due to unusually high natural gas prices." The Commissioners
also noted that "U.S. natural gas prices in 2003 are once again at
high levels and domestic producers have once again announced production
cutbacks."
Laura Baughman, Executive Director of the Committee said, "The ITC
recognized that the price of imported UAN actually exceeded the price
of U.S.-produced UAN and that it was the increased natural gas prices,
not imports, that caused domestic producers financial losses. The Committee
joined CITAC to help get that message through to policy makers. Today,
the Committee and American farmers are all pleased that the Commissioners
thoroughly reviewed the evidence and came to the correct decision."
Baughman added that U.S. consuming industries need imports such as UAN,
along with many other products, to keep supply markets competitive. Irresponsible
use of antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings can do serious
damage to America's farmers and manufacturers.
CITAC is a coalition of companies and organizations committed to promoting
a trade arena where U.S. consuming industries and their workers have access
to global markets for imports that enhance the international competitiveness
of American firms.
|