| |
|
|
| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
Dara Klatt |
| March 26, 2003 |
|
The PBN Company |
| |
|
Tel. 202-466-6210 |
| |
|
|
CITAC STEEL TASK FORCE MEMBERS TELL
HOUSE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE THAT STEEL TARIFFS
MAKE IT 'VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE' TO COMPETE GLOBALLY
Washington, DC: Consuming Industries Trade Action
Coalition Steel Task Force (CITAC STF) members testified
today before the House Ways & Means Subcommittee on Trade that they
have suffered substantial business and financial losses resulting from
the Section 201 steel tariffs imposed by the Bush Administration in 2002,
and some warned of further job losses and closures unless the tariffs
are removed.
The hearing on the "Impact of the Section 201 Safeguard Action on
Certain Steel Products" was convened by Subcommittee Chairman Phil
Crane to examine the impact of the Section 201 steel tariffs on steel
consumers and steel producers. Last week, House Ways and Means Committee
Chairman Bill Thomas formally requested that the U. S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) analyze the impact of the Section 201 steel tariffs on
steel-consuming industries.
"Today's testimony by steel consumers points to the obvious- that
the steel tariffs are causing significant damage to steel consumers and
the economy, and they must be removed as soon as possible." said
William Gaskin, CITAC STF Chairman. "The four CITAC STF members who
testified represent the steel-consuming sector in the U.S., which employs
more than 12 million workers. These jobs are every bit as important as
steel-producing jobs and we hope that Members of Congress will convey
to the Bush Administration the need to end these tariffs as soon as possible."
"CITAC STF members are gratified that last week the Ways and Means
Committee requested the International Trade Commission to investigate
the impact of the tariffs on steel consumers and we greatly appreciate
the opportunity to testify at today's hearing," stated CITAC Counsel
Lewis Leibowitz. "Our message to Congress, the Bush Administration
and steel producers is loud and clear: Steel consumers - the steel producers'
own customers - are suffering as a result of this tariff policy. We will
not rest until these tariffs are terminated."
The CITAC STF members testifying at the hearing included Lester
Trilla, President and CEO of Trilla Steel Drum Corporation; David
Pritchard, President and CEO of A.J. Rose Manufacturing; Timothy
Taylor, President of MacLean Vehicle Systems; and, Wes Smith, President
of E&E Mfg. Co. They described in personal terms the impact on their
companies of the dramatic price increases, supply shortages and quality
issues caused by the Section 201 steel tariffs and they detailed the loss
of business to foreign competitors.
Pritchard, whose Avon, Ohio-based company (A.J. Rose Manufacturing) produces
metal stampings, air bag components and spun-formed products for the automotive
market, testified that the tariffs added $1.1 million to the company's
cost of material in the last year and that these cost increases "had
a devastating effect" on the company's bottom line."
Pritchard was forced to lay off 33 workers in the past year. He stated
that the company has lost approximately $7.5 million in new orders to
competitors outside of the U.S.
"These contracts were awarded to someone else simply because we
could no longer meet our foreign competitors' prices due to the steel
tariffs," Pritchard testified.
"The tariffs have made it virtually impossible for us to compete
with our foreign competitors," Prichard said. "This constant
threat to our business is very real and will get worse if we are forced
to continue to pay such a premium for the steel we need to run our business."
Lester Trilla testified that the tariffs on cold-rolled steel caused
Chicago-based Trilla Steel Drum Corporation's steel costs to go up 70-80
percent in 2002. Trilla has raised prices by more than 20 percent and,
as a result, lost 30 percent of his longstanding customers, who moved
their business to foreign competitors who have much lower steel costs.
Other customers switched from steel drums to non-steel containers. "The
companies that made this switch have had to change their logistics facilities,
and will never come back to steel drums, which means they will not return
to Trilla or any drum manufacturer in the United States," Trilla
explained.
Trilla also testified that because he has had to switch from the higher
quality imported steel to domestic steel, the company has become less
competitive. "In the past year, we have had almost $100,000 in claims
from customers with failed coatings that are directly related to the problems
we have had with the cleanliness and quality of [domestic] steel. Before
last May, Trilla never had a failure its coatings."
Timothy Taylor, President of Chicago-based MacLean Vehicle Systems, which
producers fasteners and parts for the automotive, transportation equipment
and telecommunications and other industries, began his testimony by reminding
Committee members that Voluntary Restraint Agreements, tariffs and quotas
on steel during the 1970s and 1980s resulted in 40 percent of the U.S.
fastener manufacturing capacity disappearing or relocating offshore as
a result of the higher U.S. steel prices.
Taylor stated that his company "must have access to globally priced
steel, on the same basis as our competitors around the world, if we are
to remain competitive in the markets we serve."
Taylor said that his company has suffered a seven percent price increase
due to the Section 201 tariffs. While much less than the 30-50 percent
increases that other steel consumers suffered, the price increase was
more than enough to make his operations uncompetitive, since his company
was already at a 25 percent disadvantage on steel costs before the 201
tariff.
"This is the fundamental point: the price of raw material is irrelevant,
so long as it is a global price. When it is artificially increased in
one country, manufacturers in that country are disadvantaged and production
moves to the lowest cost," stated Taylor. "My concern is that
in attempting to 'save' jobs in the domestic steel industry, we have severely
damaged domestic steel consumers."
Taylor concluded: "[The tariff policy] is an example of the unintended
consequences of government actions to meddle in the market. And, when
we go offshore the steel-making jobs that supply us will go offshore too,
and none of these jobs will return once the technology is transferred."
Testimony presented at the House Ways & Means Subcommittee hearing
can be found here.
CITAC is a coalition of companies and organizations committed to promoting
a trade arena where U.S. consuming industries have access to global markets
for imports that enhance the international competitiveness of American
firms. The CITAC Steel Task Force is comprised of steel consumers working
to achieve the termination of the 201 steel tariffs by mid-point review
and reform U.S. trade laws and policies to benefit U.S. steel consumers.
|