| |
|
|
| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
Dara Klatt |
| January 22, 2003 |
|
The PBN Company |
| |
|
Tel. 202-466-6210 |
| |
|
|
CITAC STEEL TASK FORCE: DOMESTIC STEEL PRODUCERS'
BID TO EXPAND STEEL TARIFFS ANOTHER ATTEMPT
TO CLOSE U.S. MARKET TO IMPORTS
Move Shows That No Amount of Protection
Will Satisfy the Protectionists in the US Steel Industry
Washington, DC - The Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition
Steel Task Force (CITAC STF) submitted a letter
today to US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick and Commerce Secretary
Donald Evans urging the Bush Administration to reject a recent request
by seven U.S. steel producers to expand the Section 201 tariffs to include
30 developing countries plus Mexico, and requesting the Administration
examine the impact that the tariffs have had on steel consumers in the
U.S.
In the letter signed by its counsel Lewis Leibowitz and Lynn Kamarck,
the CITAC STF stressed that the existing tariffs have already caused severe
damage to U.S. downstream industries. "The competitive impact on
steel consuming industries is clear and simple: while steel imports are
restricted, imports of steel-containing manufactured goods are not. Many
U.S. manufacturers have lost considerable business to foreign competitors
who have access to lower-priced steel that is available in international
markets, but is now denied to U.S. manufacturers."
"The Administration should not further restrict imports without
full consideration of the effects of such restrictions on U.S. manufacturers,
including steel consuming industries," continued Leibowitz and Kamarck.
"Such an analysis is not only essential for downstream U.S. manufacturers;
it is also essential to safeguard the customer base for U.S. steel producers.
Apparently oblivious to the effects of their efforts on their own customers,
U.S. steel producers are rapidly undermining their own future by urging
ever-higher prices."
Last week, the domestic steel industry submitted a letter to Ambassador
Zoellick and Secretary Evans, using skewed statistics in an attempt to
make it appear that steel imports from developing countries and Mexico
exempted from the Section 201 tariffs by President Bush
are "surging."
A closer look at the statistics submitted by the domestic steel industry
reveals that slab (semifinished) products are conveniently excluded from
total imports of flat-rolled products even though the International Trade
Commission (ITC) and President Bush included slab products in the flat-rolled
category during the Section 201 process.
"It's obvious why the domestic steel industry omitted slabs,"
William Gaskin, President of the Precision Metalforming Association (PMA)
and member of CITAC STF. "Developing countries on the list don't
export much slab to the U.S. When imports are totaled using all flat-rolled
imports including slabs, the percentage of import share from these developing
countries is actually much lower proving there is no 'surge of
imports' and therefore no evidence for additional tariffs."
Said Gaskin, "In their letter, U.S. producers also blame developing
country imports for falling prices in recent months and reduced capacity
utilization, ignoring the fact that several dormant domestic steel mills
have been restarted since the 201 tariffs, adding 8.5 million tons of
steel production into the U.S. market."
Gaskin continued, "The tariffs imposed last year led to huge price
increases, supply disruptions and massive business and financial losses
to steel consumers. Many downstream industries are going out of business,
or being forced to move overseas, causing Americans to lose their jobs.
Attempting to expand tariffs to developing countries isn't going to solve
the domestic steel industry's biggest problem: their refusal to compete
in the global marketplace."
Gaskin pointed out that the Bush Administration last week rejected proposed
quotas to limit imports of mechanical devices from China after considering
the estimated damage it would cause downstream industries.
"As with the recent case on mechanical devices, the Bush Administration
should consider the needs of steel consumers in formulating steel trade
policy." He concluded, "We ask that the Bush Administration
direct the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to gather evidence
of the impact of the Section 201 steel tariffs already in place on both
steel producers and steel consumers."
To read the text of the letter submitted today by the CITAC STF, please
visit www.citac.info/steeltaskforce/currentnews/01_22_2003.php.
CITAC is a coalition of companies
and organizations committed to promoting a trade arena where U.S. consuming
industries and their workers have access to global markets for imports
that enhance the international competitiveness of American firms. The
CITAC Steel Task Force is comprised of steel consumers working to achieve
the termination of the 201 steel tariffs by mid-point review and reform
U.S. trade laws and policies to benefit steel consumers.
|