 |
STEEL:
CITAC Fights New Steel Trade Restrictions - Section 201 Campaign
- Why New Restrictions are Not the Answer. Read
- CITAC
Print Ads. View
- Listen
to CITAC's radio message to President Bush on open trade.
56 K | Broadband
| Transcript
(Requires
Real Player)
- Senate
Finance Committee Testimony
- Testimony of CITAC Chairman Jon Jenson on February 13, 2002. Read
- CITAC
201 Remedy Study
- "Estimated Economic Effects of Proposed Import Relief Remedies
for Steel",
December
19, 2001Read
- CITAC's
rebuttal to Domestic Steel Industry's Critique of its study.
Read
- CITAC Participation in 2001 International Trade Commission Section
201 Steel Investigation. Read
- CITAC
Steel Quota and Tax Study, May 2001
Download
this major study.
 Return to Top
ON
THE BYRD AMENDMENT ARCHIVE 2000-2003:
CITAC opposes
the "Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act" (the so-called "Byrd
Amendment") as a threat to consuming industries, their workers and
to the Nation's economy. In addition, CITAC maintains that the amendment
violates U.S. World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations. To learn
more about the amendment and CITAC's position, please see:
-
Rushford Report: Arguments for and against the Byrd Amendment.
May 2004 Read
-
CITAC: time to end trade-distorting Byrd Amendment payouts. 5/7/04 Read
-
U.S. Congress House of Representative members request General Accounting Office to provide a detailed analyses of the Byrd Amendment impact on recipient industry. April 30, 2004 Read
- Byrd Amendment million dollar (or more) jackpot winners in 2003. See the list
- Congressional Budget Office report on the Byrd Amendment. March 2004 Read
- CITAC Issue Brief: The Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act ("Byrd Amendment"),
March 2, 2001 Read
- CITAC Letter to Donald Evans,
U.S. Department of Commerce — March 2, 2001 Read
- Rising Transatlantic Tensions
over the Byrd Amendment on Antidumping and Countervailing Duties, November
13, 2000 Read
- CITAC Letter to the Honorable
Senator Trent Lott, October 27, 2000 Read
- CITAC Letter to the Honorable
J Dennis Hastert - October 27, 2000 Read
Return to Top
SOFTWOOD
LUMBER DEBATE:
Consuming industries
dependent on open markets for lumber include homebuilders (including
pre-manufactured homes and mobile homes), furniture manufacturers,
makers of shelving and other home accessories and other industries.
Collectively, these industries employ some six million workers,
compared to 200,000 in lumber and allied industries, a ratio of
30 to 1. With the expiration of the Softwood Lumber Agreement, consideration
of the welfare of consuming industries must weigh in to any decisions
about further restrictions on trade in lumber. For more information
on CITAC's positions, please see:
- More Bad News For Lumber Users
And Homebuyers: Commerce Department Layers Penalties On Canadian Softwood, October 31, 2001 Read
- Consuming Industries Say Penalty
On Softwood Lumber "Very Troubling" - August 15, 2001 Read
- Citac Chairman Jenson Urges International
Trade Commission To Heed Consumer Testimony In Softwood Lumber Decision
- April 23, 2001 Read
Return to Top
AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER SHORTAGES:
U.S. manufacturers
of ammonium nitrate, claiming injury due to imports from Ukraine,
filed a trade case in October 2000. The filing will effectively
end imports of ammonium nitrate, a key ingredient in fertilizer,
to the United States from Ukraine. These same producers filed a
similar case against Russia a year earlier that reduced imports
of nitrate from Russia to a trickle. The loss of these important
sources of affordable nitrate has put farmers in a shortage bind.
The import disruption is complicated by the failure of U.S. producers
to makeup the shortfall and meet U.S. demand. For more information
on CITAC's position, please see:
- Import Restraints Hitting the
Heartland: Serious Fertilizer Shortage Threatens Family Farmers - February
13, 2001 Read
Return to Top
|
|
